Value-based medicine and ophthalmology: an appraisal of cost-utility analyses.
نویسندگان
چکیده
PURPOSE To ascertain the extent to which ophthalmologic interventions have been evaluated in value-based medicine format. METHODS Retrospective literature review. Papers in the healthcare literature utilizing cost-utility analysis were reviewed by researchers at the Center for Value-Based Medicine, Flourtown, Pennsylvania. A literature review of papers addressing the cost-utility analysis of ophthalmologic procedures in the United States over a 12-year period from 1992 to 2003 was undertaken using the National Library of Medicine and EMBASE databases. The cost-utility of ophthalmologic interventions in inflation-adjusted (real) year 2003 US dollars expended per quality-adjusted life-year (dollars/QALY) was ascertained in all instances. RESULTS A total of 19 papers were found, including a total of 25 interventions. The median cost-utility of ophthalmologic interventions was 5,219 dollars/QALY, with a range from 746 dollars/QALY to 6.5 million dollars/QALY. CONCLUSIONS The majority of ophthalmologic interventions are especially cost-effective by conventional standards. This is because of the substantial value that ophthalmologic interventions confer to patients with eye diseases for the resources expended.
منابع مشابه
Value-based medicine, comparative effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness analysis of topical cyclosporine for the treatment of dry eye syndrome.
OBJECTIVE To assess the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness (cost-utility) of a 0.05% emulsion of topical cyclosporine (Restasis; Allergan Inc, Irvine, California) for the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye syndrome that is unresponsive to conventional therapy. METHODS Data from 2 multicenter, randomized, clinical trials and Food and Drug Administration files for topical cyc...
متن کاملValue based medicine.
T he article by Hopley and associates in this issue of the BJO (p 982) is a well performed study that utilises a form of healthcare economic analysis that is increasing in popularity throughout the healthcare literature. This instrument, cost utility analysis, has also been referred to by some as cost effectiveness analysis. A review of the healthcare literature using the key words ‘‘cost utili...
متن کاملThe goal of value-based medicine analyses: comparability. The case for neovascular macular degeneration.
PURPOSE To evaluate the comparability of articles in the peer-reviewed literature assessing the (1) patient value and (2) cost-utility (cost-effectiveness) associated with interventions for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). METHODS A search was performed in the National Library of Medicine database of 16 million peer-reviewed articles using the key words cost-utility, cost-...
متن کاملCost-utility Analysis Value-based Medicine Analysis: Ophthalmic Cost-utility Analyses
Melissa M. Brown, MD, MN, MBA Gary C. Brown, MD, MBA Peter Kertes, MD It is the philosophy of Evidence-Based Ophthalmology that the best evidencebased medicine should provide the foundation for knowledge, which will allow practitioners to provide the highest quality of medicine for our patients. Although the knowledge of a numerical or statistical change is critical, this information must be ta...
متن کاملA value-based medicine analysis of ranibizumab for the treatment of subfoveal neovascular macular degeneration.
OBJECTIVE To assess the conferred value and average cost-utility (cost-effectiveness) for intravitreal ranibizumab used to treat occult/minimally classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN Value-based medicine cost-utility analysis. PARTICIPANTS MARINA (Minimally Classic/Occult Trial of the Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth F...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
دوره 102 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004